A Handbook of Educational Research for Beginners

Özden Şengül
Boğaziçi University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-7897

Downloads

Read Book Download

Synopsis

This book focuses on educational research for college students, teachers, and beginner educational researchers. It can guide researchers to get an overall understanding of what research is, what education research entails, and how teachers can design, implement, and evaluate a study to understand the effectiveness of an instructional strategy or improve student learning. It has an introductory level, easy to understand with plenty of examples. Teachers can find relevant materials to learn methods to guide their students by using different forms of research tools in data collection and analysis. Readers are exposed to craft research topics and research questions. Instructors can organize individual and group study programs for their students. The book suggests the readers to read published research articles to explore what has been done on educational research and draw links between the similarities between scientific research and educational research. It is great to cover different research designs to collect and analyze data and consider ethical considerations in research. A teacher or instructor can use this book to provide support and case studies to his/her students to get deeper insights into research and applications in real classroom settings. The book can support learners and teachers to see the continuity and coherence across the elements of educational research throughout the chapters. Readers can understand how to develop and refine a research proposal by the end of the book.

Keywords:

  1. Aaron Price, C., & Chiu, A. (2018). An experimental study of a museum-based, science PD programme’s impact on teachers and their students. International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 941-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1457816 📋
  2. Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers' opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4 📋
  3. Akar, I. (2020). An Overview of the Phenomenon of Waiting in the Class from the Perspective of the Classroom Teacher: A Phenomenology Study. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 60-79. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.20.7.2 📋
  4. Alaj ääski*, J. (2006). How does Web technology affect students’ attitudes towards the discipline and study of mathematics/statistics? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(1), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500226002 📋
  5. Andersson, J., Schaben, C., Buhs, E., & Grandgenett, N. (2021). Phenomenology of Secondary Students' Experiences in Out-of-School Time Science Research. Science Educator, 28(1), 30-39. 📋
  6. Apthorp, H. S. (2006). Effects of a supplemental vocabulary program in third-grade reading/language arts. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(2), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.2.67-79 📋
  7. Aytekin, E., & Isiksal-Bostan, M. (2019). Middle school students’ attitudes towards the use of technology in mathematics lessons: does gender make a difference?. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(5), 707-727. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1535097 📋
  8. Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research, Inc. 📋
  9. Bar-On, R. (2000). Emotional and Social Intelligence: Insights from the Emotional Quotient Inventory. In R. Bar-On and J.D.A. Parker (Eds.) The Handbook of emotional intelligence. (pp. 363-388). San Francisco: Jossey: Boss. 📋
  10. Baxter, J., & Wright, E. O. (2000). The glass ceiling hypothesis: A comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society, 14(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014002004 📋
  11. Bayuo, J., Abukari, M. A., Bornaa, C. S., Samari, J. A., & Alagbela, A. A. (2022). Utilization of Information and Communication Technology in Teaching and Learning of Chemistry at Senior High Schools in Ghana. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(2), ep22018. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12364 📋
  12. Bisaillon, J., Mercure, C., Villeneuve, S., & Plante, I. (2023). Cyberbullying of professors: what measures are in place in universities and what solutions are proposed by victims?. Studies in Higher Education, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2206431 📋
  13. Block, C. R. (2015). Examining a public Montessori school’s response to the pressures of high-stakes accountability. Journal of Montessori Research, 1(1), 42-54. 📋
  14. Blown, E. J., & Bryce, T. G. (2006). Knowledge restructuring in the development of children’s cosmologies. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1411-1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718062 📋
  15. Bryce, T. K., & Blown, E. J. (2007). Gender effects in children’s development and education. International Journal of Science Education, 29(13), 1655-1678. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701278420 📋
  16. Carrington, S., Templeton, E., & Papinczak, T. (2003). Adolescents with Asperger syndrome and perceptions of friendship. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(4), 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576030180040201 📋
  17. Cavagnetto, A., Hand, B. M., & Norton‐Meier, L. (2010). The nature of elementary student science discourse in the context of the science writing heuristic approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32(4), 427-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802627277 📋
  18. Chang, P. T. (1986). Academic performance, sex difference and attitudes toward mathematics of small groups as factors in college developmental mathematics courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 17(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739860170205 📋
  19. Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008 📋
  20. Chen, S., Jamiatul Husnaini, S., & Chen, J. J. (2020). Effects of games on students’ emotions of learning science and achievement in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), 2224-2245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1817607 📋
  21. Chia, H. M., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Comparing Malaysian secondary school teachers’ and students’ values in mathematics learning: a mixed method study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2204103 📋
  22. Cho, E. (2018). Songs of their lives: A narrative study of three older Korean immigrants in Los Angeles. Research Studies in Music Education, 40(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X18774346 📋
  23. Cihak, D. F., Kessler, K., & Alberto, P. A. (2008). Use of a handheld prompting system to transition independently through vocational tasks for students with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 102-110. 📋
  24. Cihak, D. F. (2009). Using video modeling via handheld computers to improve geometry skills for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(4), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340902400402 📋
  25. Creswell, J. (2002). An Overview of Educational Research. Pearson Education 📋
  26. Creswell, J. (2010) “Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research”, in in Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (Eds) 2010, Sage, California, pp45-68. 📋
  27. Cole, D., Kitchen, J. A., & Kezar, A. (2019). Examining a comprehensive college transition program: An account of iterative mixed methods longitudinal survey design. Research in Higher Education, 60, 392-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9515-1 📋
  28. Crotty, M. J. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE. 📋
  29. Dallos, R., & Denford, S. (2008). A qualitative exploration of relationship and attachment themes in families with an eating disorder. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 13(2), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104507088349 📋
  30. Dean, D. (2021). Experiences of Chinese Students in Higher Education in the Southeastern United States: A Narrative Study. Dissertation Thesis. 📋
  31. Demirçali, S., & Selvi, M. (2022). Effects of model-based science education on students’ academic achievement and scientific process skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.136 📋
  32. Denman, I., Banajee, M., & Hurley, A. (2015). Dichotic listening training in children with autism spectrum disorder: A single subject design. International Journal of Audiology, 54(12), 991-996. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1070308 📋
  33. Détienne, F., Baker, M., Vanhille, M., & Mougenot, C. (2017). Cultures of collaboration in engineering design education: a contrastive case study in France and Japan. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 5(1-2), 104-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2016.1218796 📋
  34. Deslandes, R., & Bertrand, R. (2005). Motivation of parent involvement in secondary-level schooling. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.164-175 📋
  35. Di Mauro, M. F., & Furman, M. (2016). Impact of an inquiry unit on grade 4 students’ science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 38(14), 2239-2258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1234085 📋
  36. Eichler, M., & Albanese, P. (2007). What is household work? A critique of assumptions underlying empirical studies of housework and an alternative approach. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 227-258. https://doi.org/10.2307/20460633 📋
  37. Elliott, L., Henderson, M., Nixon, C., & Wight, D. (2013). Has untargeted sexual health promotion for young people reached its limit? A quasi-experimental study. J Epidemiol Community Health, 67(5), 398-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201034 📋
  38. Ertekin, E., Yazici, E., & Delice, A. (2014). Investigation of primary mathematics student teachers’ concept images: cylinder and cone. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(4), 566-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.868537 📋
  39. Faretta, R. S. (2016). A causal-comparative inquiry into the significance of implementing a flipped classroom strategy in nursing education. Liberty University. 📋
  40. Freeman, S. D. M. (2009). The transcultural adaptation of western counseling in Japan: A grounded theory (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi). 📋
  41. Giambo, D. A. (2017). " I Will Study More... and Pray": Metacognition about High-Stakes Test Preparation among Culturally & Linguistically Diverse Students. Multicultural Education, 24, 26-34. 📋
  42. Grooms, J., Sampson, V. & Golden, B. (2014) Comparing the Effectiveness of Verification and Inquiry Laboratories in Supporting Undergraduate Science Students in Constructing Arguments Around Socioscientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 36:9, 1412-1433, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.891160 📋
  43. Hand, B., Wallace, C. W., & Yang E. (2004). Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh‐grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26:2, 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070252 📋
  44. Haj-Yahya, A., & Olsher, S. (2022). Preservice teachers’ experiences with digital formative assessment in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(7), 1751-1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1842527 📋
  45. Hermann, N., & Menzel, S. (2013). Threat Perception and Attitudes of Adolescents Towards Re-Introduced Wild Animals: A qualitative study of young learners from affected regions in Germany. International Journal of Science Education, 35:18, 3062-3094. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.685196 📋
  46. Hill, D. K., & Merrell, K. W. (2004). Characteristics of “controversial” children: An exploration of teacher and parent social behavior rating scale datasets. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 497-507. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10175 📋
  47. Huang, F. (2017). The impact of mass and universal higher education on curriculum and instruction: case studies of China and Japan. Higher Education, 74, 507-525. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10734-016-0061-5 📋
  48. Hsu, Y. S., & Thomas, R. A. (2002). The impacts of a web-aided instructional simulation on science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 955-979. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110095258 📋
  49. Jin, X., Li, T., Meirink, J., van der Want, A., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Learning from novice–expert interaction in teachers’ continuing professional development. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 745-762. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1651752 📋
  50. Johnson, A. C. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91(5), 805-821. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20208 📋
  51. Jong, M. S. Y. (2019). To flip or not to flip: Social science faculty members’ concerns about flipping the classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(2), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09217-y 📋
  52. Jungić, V., Kaur, H., Mulholland, J., & Xin, C. (2015). On flipping the classroom in large first year calculus courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 508-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.990529 📋
  53. Kahveci, A., Sahin, N., & Genc, S. (2011). Computer Perceptions of Secondary School Teachers and Impacting Demographics: A Turkish Perspective. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(1), 71-80. 📋
  54. Kaleli-Yılmaz, G. & Hanci, A. (2016). Examination of the 8th grade students' TIMSS mathematics success in terms of different variables. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47:5, 674-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1102977 📋
  55. Kandiah, J., & Jones, C. (2002). Nutrition knowledge and food choices of elementary school children. Early Child Development and Care, 172(3), 269-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430212123 📋
  56. Kern, P., Wolery, M., & Aldridge, D. (2007). Use of songs to promote independence in morning greeting routines for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1264-1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0272-1 📋
  57. Kesamang, M. E. E., & Taiwo, A. A. (2002). The correlates of the socio-cultural background of Botswana junior secondary school students with their attitudes towards and achievements in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 919-940. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098903 📋
  58. Kind, V. (2014). A Degree Is Not Enough: A quantitative study of aspects of pre-service science teachers’ chemistry content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36:8, 1313-1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.860497 📋
  59. Kiwanuka, H. N., Van Damme, J., Van den Noortgate, W., & Reynolds, C. (2022). Temporal relationship between attitude toward mathematics and mathematics achievement. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(6), 1546-1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1832268 📋
  60. Koerner, M. E., & Abdul-Tawwab, N. (2006). Using community as a resource for teacher education: A case study. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680500478767 📋
  61. Konvalina, J. (1981). An experimental study in basic mathematics concerning self‐assessment, achievement, and confidence. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 12(3), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739810120303 📋
  62. Li, I., Onaga, E., Shen, P. S., & Chiou, H. H. (2009). Temperament characteristics and science achievement: A longitudinal study of elementary students in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1175-1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701793923 📋
  63. Liang, L. L. & Gabel, D. L. (2005) Effectiveness of a Constructivist Approach to Science Instruction for Prospective Elementary Teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27:10, 1143-1162, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500069442 📋
  64. Liang, L. L., Fulmer, G. W., Majerich, D. M., Clevenstine, R., & Howanski, R. (2012). The effects of a model-based physics curriculum program with a physics first approach: A causal-comparative study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9287-2 📋
  65. Lin, Y. R. (2022). The influence of students’ position on argumentation learning through online and face-to-face environments. International Journal of Science Education, 44(17), 2632-2657. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2141082 📋
  66. Marchant, G. J. & Paulson, S. E. (2005, January 21). The relationship of high school graduation exams to graduation rates and SAT scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(6). Retrieved [date] from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n6/ 📋
  67. Marszalek, J. M. (2022). Getting in the flow: adolescent test-takers, motivation, and optimal performance. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34(2), 241-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09377-5 📋
  68. McGee, J. R., & Wang, C. (2014). Validity-supporting evidence of the self-efficacy for teaching mathematics instrument. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(5), 390-403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913516280 📋
  69. McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2016). Factors impacting teachers' argumentation instruction in their science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 2026-2046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1221547 📋
  70. Mecabe, A. D. (2010). Relationship between parent involvement and their second grade child's emotional intelligence. Dowling College. 📋
  71. Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2016). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson. 📋
  72. Mozzer, N. B., & Justi, R. (2012). Students' pre-and post-teaching analogical reasoning when they draw their analogies. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 429-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.593202 📋
  73. Nabayra, L. J., & Sagge, R. G. (2022). The Mathematics Teaching Performance of Scholar Education Graduates in Selected Public Schools in the Philippines: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Method Study. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(4), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i4.47 📋
  74. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Basics of social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Pearson Canada. 📋
  75. Newman, M. L., Holden, G. W., & Delville, Y. (2011). Coping with the stress of being bullied: Consequences of coping strategies among college students. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610386388 📋
  76. Oladunni, M. O. (1998). An experimental study on the effectiveness of metacognitive and heuristic problem-solving techniques on computational performance of students in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 29(6), 867-874. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739980290608 📋
  77. O'Leary, K., Fitzpatrick, C. L., & Hallett, D. (2017). Math anxiety is related to some, but not all, experiences with math. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2067. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02067 📋
  78. Oliver, M., & Venville, G. (2011). An exploratory case study of Olympiad students’ attitudes towards and passion for science. International journal of science education, 33(16), 2295-2322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.550654 📋
  79. Overman, M., Vermunt, J. D., Meijer, P. C., Bulte, A. M., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Students' perceptions of teaching in context-based and traditional chemistry classrooms: Comparing content, learning activities, and interpersonal perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1871-1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.880004 📋
  80. Parson, L. (2018). An Institutional Ethnography of Higher Education: The Experiences of Undergraduate Women Majoring in Math and Physics. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 13(1). 📋
  81. Plano Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. Pearson. 📋
  82. Punter, P., Ochando‐Pardo, M., & Garcia, J. (2011). Spanish secondary school students' notions on the causes and consequences of climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 447-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.492253 📋
  83. Raved, L., & Zvi Assaraf, O. A. (2011). Attitudes towards Science Learning among 10th‐Grade Students: A qualitative look. International Journal of Science Education, 33:9, 1219-1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.508503 📋
  84. Rodger, S., Stephens, E., Clark, M., Ash, S., Hurst, C., & Graves, N. (2012). Productivity and time use during occupational therapy and nutrition/dietetics clinical education: A cohort study. PLoS ONE, 7(8): e44356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044356 📋
  85. Rutkowski, D., & Wild, J. (2015). Stakes matter: Student motivation and the validity of student assessments for teacher evaluation. Educational Assessment, 20(3), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1059273 📋
  86. Rushton, S. J. (2018). Teaching and learning mathematics through error analysis. Fields Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40928-018-0009-y 📋
  87. Ryan, M., Fitzmaurice, O., & Johnson, P. (2023). Investigating mathematics anxiety among mature students in service mathematics courses using the mathematics anxiety scale UK. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2179950 📋
  88. Said, Z., Summers, R., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Wang, S. (2016). Attitudes toward science among grades 3 through 12 Arab students in Qatar: findings from a cross-sectional national study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 621-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1156184 📋
  89. Schlosser, G. A. (2001). Stories of success from eminent Finnish women: a narrative study. High Ability Studies, 12(1), 61-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130120058699 📋
  90. Self-Brown, S. R., & Mathews, S. (2003). Effects of classroom structure on student achievement goal orientation. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(2), 106-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309597513 📋
  91. Sener, N., Türk, C., & Tas, E. (2015). Improving Science Attitude and Creative Thinking through Science Education Project: A Design, Implementation and Assessment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(4), 57-67. 📋
  92. Shah, P., & Khurshid, A. (2019). Muslim womanhood, education, and empowerment: Ethnographic reflections from Pakistan and India. Gender and Education, 31(4), 458-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1543859 📋
  93. Shongwe, B. (2022). A causal-comparative study of South African pre-service primary mathematics teachers’ spatial visualization ability: does common content knowledge matter?. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(9), 2338-2363. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1869333 📋
  94. Skarstein, T. H., & Skarstein, F. (2020). Curious children and knowledgeable adults–early childhood student-teachers’ species identification skills and their views on the importance of species knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 310-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1710782 📋
  95. Smith, L. E., Greenberg, J. S., & Seltzer, M. M. (2012). Social support and well-being at mid-life among mothers of adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1818-1826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1420-9. 📋
  96. Stevenson, H. W., & Nerison-Low, R. (2002). To Sum It Up: Case Studies of Education in Germany, Japan, and the United States. U.S. Department of Education, OERI/Student Achievement Institute, 555 New Jersey Avenue N.W., Room 510, Washington, DC 20208-5573. Tel: 202-219-2079; Fax: 202-219-2135; e-mail: [email protected]. For full text: http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/SAI/ 📋
  97. Suinn, R. M., & Winston, E. H. (2003). The mathematics anxiety rating scale, a brief version: psychometric data. Psychological Reports, 92(1), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.92.1.167 📋
  98. Suprapto, N. (2019, February). Demographic sources as a local wisdom: Potency of Indonesian physics education researchers in conducting survey research. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1171, No. 1, p. 012003). IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012003 📋
  99. Terrill, L., & Gullifer, J. (2010). Growing older: A qualitative inquiry into the textured narratives of older, rural women. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(5), 707-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310368180 📋
  100. Thomas, C., & Ryan, M. (2008). Women's perception of the divorce experience: A qualitative study. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 49(3-4), 210-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502550802222394 📋
  101. Tozer, R., Atkin, K., & Wenham, A. (2013). Continuity, commitment and context: Adult siblings of people with autism plus learning disability. Health & Social Care in the Community, 21(5), 480-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12034 📋
  102. Tucker, J. S., Green Jr, H. D., Zhou, A. J., Miles, J. N., Shih, R. A., & D’Amico, E. J. (2011). Substance use among middle school students: Associations with self-rated and peer-nominated popularity. Journal of Adolescence, 34(3), 513-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.016 📋
  103. Turkka, J., Haatainen, O., & Aksela, M. (2017). Integrating art into science education: a survey of science teachers’ practices, International Journal of Science Education, 39:10, 1403-1419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1333656 📋
  104. Ucar, H., Bozkurt, A., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2021). Academic procrastination and performance in distance education: A causal-comparative study in an online learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(4), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1002726 📋
  105. Ueda, K., & Sakugawa, H. (2009). Using phenomenology to study how junior and senior high school students in Japan perceive their volunteer efforts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800207 📋
  106. Varma, T., Volkmann, M., & Hanuscin, D. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ perceptions of their understanding of inquiry and inquiry-based science pedagogy: Influence of an elementary science education methods course and a science field experience. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 1-22. 📋
  107. Vosniadou, S., & Skopeliti, I. (2017). Is it the Earth that turns or the Sun that goes behind the mountains? Students’ misconceptions about the day/night cycle after reading a science text. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2027-2051. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1361557 📋
  108. Wang, Z., Pang, H., Zhou, J., Ma, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). “What if…it never ends?”: Examining challenges in primary teachers' experience during the wholly online teaching, The Journal of Educational Research, 114:1, 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1884823 📋
  109. Wong, B. (2012). Identifying with science: A case study of two 13-year-old ‘high achieving working class’ British Asian girls. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.551671 📋
  110. Wylie, L. E., Gibson, C. L., Brank, E. M., Fondacaro, M. R., Smith, S. W., Brown, V. E., & Miller, S. A. (2010). Assessing school and student predictors of weapons reporting. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(4), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204010368641 📋
  111. Wu, Y.T. & Tsai, C.C. (2007). High School Students’ Informal Reasoning on a Socio‐scientific Issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses. International Journal of Science Education, 29:9, 1163-1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601083375 📋
  112. Wolgemuth, J. R., Erdil-Moody, Z., Opsal, T., Cross, J. E., Kaanta, T., Dickmann, E. M., & Colomer, S. (2015). Participants’ experiences of the qualitative interview: Considering the importance of research paradigms. Qualitative research, 15(3), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114524222 📋
  113. Xu, Y., & Liu, W. (2010). A project-based learning approach: a case study in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 363-370. 📋
  114. Yanagi, Y., & Takaoka, K. (2022). How school staff hesitate to report child maltreatment in Japan: a process model of child protection, generated via grounded theory. Children and Youth Services Review, 141, 106617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106617 📋
  115. Yoon, H., Woo, A. J., Treagust, D., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2014). The efficacy of problem-based learning in an analytical laboratory course for pre-service chemistry teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 79-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.727041 📋
  116. Zacharia, Z. C., Lazaridou, C., & Avraamidou, L. (2016). The use of mobile devices as a means of data collection in supporting elementary school students’ conceptual understanding about plants. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 596-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1153811 📋
  117. Zeng, B., & He, Y. (2019). Factors influencing Chinese tourist flow in Japan–a grounded theory approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(1), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1541185 📋

How to cite this book

Şengül, Ö. (2024). A Handbook of Educational Research for Beginners. Özgür Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub419

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published

August 8, 2024

ISBN

PDF
978-975-447-905-8

DOI

https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub419

Categories

Copyright (c) 2024 Özden Şengül